What Is Balance Billing in Healthcare?

/

balance billing in healthcare Alleva EHR EMR feature image scaled

Balance billing in healthcare is a billing practice in which a provider charges a patient for the difference between the provider’s full fee and the amount the patient’s insurance plan has agreed to pay.

For behavioral health organizations managing complex admissions, clinical handoffs, and payer relationships, understanding balance billing in healthcare and the federal protections that limit it is foundational to protecting patients and maintaining clean revenue cycle workflows.

When patients receive care from out-of-network providers (often without realizing it) they may face unexpected bills that their insurance did not fully cover. These are commonly called surprise medical bills.

Behavioral health settings are particularly prone to this because of transfers between levels of care, offsite testing, and consulting clinicians who may not share the same network as the primary facility.

How Surprise Medical Bills Happen in Behavioral Health

A surprise medical bill is a form of balance billing in healthcare that occurs when a patient unknowingly receives care from an out-of-network provider. Common scenarios include:

  • Emergency care, where a patient has no opportunity to verify provider network status
  • Treatment at an in-network facility where certain clinicians (such as consulting psychiatrists, lab technicians, or discharge planners) are out of network
  • Transfers between treatment levels where the receiving facility or clinician operates under a different payer contract
  • Offsite diagnostic or ancillary services billed separately from the admitting facility

In behavioral health specifically, these situations arise most often at clinical handoff points. Tracking insurance verification from intake through discharge, including confirming that all involved clinicians are in-network, can reduce the frequency of surprise billing in mental health service events and the administrative burden of resolving them.

A structural contributor to surprise balance billing in healthcare is that physicians and hospitals often contract with health plans separately. A patient can receive care at an in-network facility while being treated by a clinician who did not independently contract with their plan. Provider directories are not always current, which is why verifying network status through multiple channels, not just a directory search, is the most reliable protection against unexpected bills.

Understanding balance billing is a core part of revenue cycle management for behavioral health, as it effects how you get paid and by whom.

What the No Surprises Act Protects Against

The No Surprises Act is a federal law, effective January 1, 2022, that protects patients from balance billing in healthcare in three primary situations:

  • Emergency care: Patients cannot be balance-billed beyond in-network cost-sharing, regardless of whether the treating provider or facility is out of network
  • Non-emergency services at in-network facilities: For certain specialties, including emergency medicine, anesthesia, pathology, radiology, neonatology, and laboratory services, out-of-network providers cannot balance bill patients who receive care at an in-network facility
  • Air ambulance services: Out-of-network air ambulance providers cannot balance bill patients covered by group or individual health plans

When these protections apply, patients owe only in-network cost-sharing amounts: their applicable copayments, coinsurance, and deductible. The provider and the health plan resolve any remaining payment dispute between themselves, keeping the patient out of it.

The law also requires providers and facilities to give patients a plain-language notice of their rights against balance billing in healthcare. Behavioral health billing teams should ensure this notice is documented in the patient record as standard intake procedure.

What Patients May Still Owe

Federal protections do not eliminate all patient cost-sharing. Even when the No Surprises Act applies, patients remain responsible for:

  • Copayments, coinsurance, and deductibles calculated at in-network rates under their plan
  • Charges for services outside the Act’s scope, including most standalone dental, vision, and other ancillary plans not integrated with medical coverage
  • Amounts they consented to in writing, if a patient receives a required written notice and voluntarily signs a consent at least 72 hours before a scheduled non-emergency service, the provider may be permitted to balance bill for amounts beyond in-network cost-sharing

Medicaid, Medicare, and TRICARE operate under separate rules and are not governed by the No Surprises Act in the same way as commercial plans. Self-funded employer plans are subject to the Act, while fully insured plans follow both federal and applicable state rules.

From an operational standpoint, maintaining complete documentation of notices and consents is not just a compliance requirement, it is what determines what can lawfully be billed to the patient. RCM and billing teams should treat these records with the same care as clinical documentation.

A year-end billing compliance review is also a practical opportunity to audit whether notice-and-consent workflows are being applied consistently across all payer types and service lines.

Good Faith Estimates and the Uninsured

Under the No Surprises Act, providers must also give uninsured patients (or patients choosing to self-pay) a Good Faith Estimate (GFE) of expected charges before scheduled services. If the final bill exceeds the GFE by more than $400, the patient can initiate a patient-provider dispute resolution process.

For behavioral health organizations working with patients who have lapsed coverage, deferred insurance enrollment, or are paying out of pocket, maintaining a consistent GFE workflow reduces both patient disputes and downstream administrative burden.

The federal government has also proposed an Advanced Explanation of Benefits (AEOB) requirement that would require providers and plans to send patients cost estimates before scheduled services. When finalized, the AEOB rule would give patients earlier visibility into expected out-of-pocket costs, reducing the likelihood of unexpected bills at the time of service.

How the Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process Works in 2025

When a provider and a health plan cannot agree on payment for a covered out-of-network service, the No Surprises Act establishes a Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. Key features include:

  • A 30-day open negotiation period must occur before either party can initiate IDR
  • If negotiation fails, either party can submit the dispute to a federally certified IDR entity
  • The arbitrator issues a binding decision based on the Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA), generally the median contracted rate for the service in the geographic area, along with other factors such as the provider’s training, experience, and case complexity
  • The patient is not a party to IDR; the process resolves payment between the provider and the plan only

The IDR landscape is actively evolving. As of late 2025, the federal government was finalizing an IDR Final Rule aimed at streamlining the portal, requiring payer registration, and updating eligibility determination criteria. CMS data reported hundreds of thousands of IDR disputes monthly as the backlog from earlier years was being cleared.

Behavioral health billing teams should monitor regulatory updates and ensure their documentation is IDR-ready before initiating disputes.

Keeping compliance documentation audit-ready, including timestamped records of notices, consents, EOBs, and negotiation communications, strengthens both IDR submissions and any downstream regulatory review.

What to Do When a Patient Receives a Surprise Bill

When a patient brings a surprise bill to your attention, a structured response protects both the patient and your organization’s position in any dispute. Here are the recommended steps:

  1. Gather the core documents: Explanation of Benefits (EOB) from the insurer, itemized bill from the provider, written notice and consent records, and any prior authorization documentation
  2. Confirm the service context: Was the service an emergency? Was it performed at an in-network facility? Is the clinician who billed out of network?
  3. Compare cost-sharing: Does the bill reflect in-network cost-sharing terms, or has the patient been charged beyond those amounts?
  4. Notify the relevant parties: If protections appear to apply, contact both the insurer and the billing provider in writing, stating that the bill may violate the No Surprises Act and requesting an internal review
  5. Document everything with timestamps: All calls, messages, and written responses should be logged and retained
  6. Escalate through IDR if needed: If the provider-plan negotiation period (30 days) ends without resolution, either party may initiate the federal IDR process
  7. Direct patients to federal resources: Patients can file complaints and access guidance at the CMS No Surprises Act help center

Behavioral health organizations with integrated RCM workflows are better positioned to catch network verification gaps before they result in surprise bills, rather than resolving disputes after the fact. An integrated billing and EMR system can support network verification, notice and consent retention, and audit trail documentation as part of standard operational workflows.

Sample screenshot of how Alleva EMR works for balance billing in healthcare

Reduce Surprise Balance Billing in Healthcare Risks

Behavioral health teams navigating complex admissions, clinical handoffs, and evolving billing regulations can reduce surprise billing incidents by combining proactive insurance verification, consistent documentation practices, and coordinated RCM workflows.

Explore whether Alleva’s integrated EMR, CRM, and RCM capabilities can help your organization manage network verification, preserve required notices and consents, and maintain clearer audit trails for dispute resolution for any balance billing in healthcare.

Schedule a demo to see how Alleva supports billing and compliance workstreams without increasing administrative burden.



Balance Billing in Healthcare FAQs

Here are some questions people also ask about balancce billing in healthcare.

Can providers balance bill me if I knowingly see an out-of-network provider?

Yes, in some situations. For scheduled non-emergency care at an in-network facility, a provider may be permitted to balance bill if the patient receives a required written notice and gives informed written consent at least 72 hours before the service.

The No Surprises Act generally prevents balance billing in healthcare for emergency care and for most out-of-network services at in-network facilities unless proper notice and consent procedures are followed. Billing teams should confirm that the correct notice and signed consent are on file before submitting patient charges.

How long do I have to dispute a surprise medical bill?

Timelines vary by process. Patients should raise concerns promptly with their insurer and the billing provider, and retain all documentation. The No Surprises Act establishes specific procedural timelines for provider-plan negotiations and for IDR, including a required 30-day open negotiation period before arbitration.

Consumer complaint windows with state or federal regulators are less uniform. Filing early preserves evidence and improves the likelihood of a timely resolution.

Who enforces the No Surprises Act and where do I file a complaint?

The No Surprises Act is enforced at the federal level by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor, and the Treasury, with support from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Consumers can file complaints and access resources through the CMS No Surprises Act help page.

States may also have their own enforcement mechanisms for state-level balance billing in healthcare laws. Behavioral health organizations should coordinate with their legal or compliance team before filing to ensure consistent messaging and record preservation.

What is the Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) and why does it matter?

The QPA is generally the median contracted rate for a given service in a specific geographic area, calculated based on plans’ in-network contracts for that service as of a defined base period. It is the primary benchmark IDR arbiters consider when making payment determinations under the No Surprises Act.

Understanding where your organization’s billing rates sit relative to the QPA can inform both negotiation strategy and IDR submission decisions.

What is independent dispute resolution (IDR) and when does it apply?

IDR is a federally created process that allows a certified third-party arbitrator to resolve payment disputes between an out-of-network provider and a health plan when the No Surprises Act protections apply and the parties cannot agree during the 30-day open negotiation period. The arbitrator issues a binding decision based on the QPA, market data, provider training, and case complexity.

As of 2025, the federal IDR portal is processing disputes at scale and a final rule to streamline the process is expected. Behavioral health billing teams should track IDR portal timelines and the current status of the IDR Final Rule before initiating a dispute.

Can hospitals balance bill me for emergency services from an out-of-network physician?

No. Under the No Surprises Act, patients receiving emergency care cannot be balance-billed for amounts beyond in-network cost-sharing, even if the treating emergency physician is out of network. The hospital or clinician must limit the patient to in-network cost-sharing and resolve any payment dispute with the plan through negotiation or IDR.

Do No Surprises Act protections apply to dental, vision, or separate ancillary plans?

Typically not. The Act applies to group health plans and most individual and group commercial health insurance products covering medical services. Standalone dental, vision, and other ancillary plans not integrated with medical coverage are generally outside its scope.

Medicaid, Medicare, and TRICARE follow separate rules. Providers and billing teams should confirm plan type and coverage before relying on No Surprises Act protections.

Will state balance-billing laws change how the federal rule applies to me?

Yes, they may. State laws that are more protective of patients will generally supplement federal protections. The interaction between state and federal law can be complex, particularly for fully insured versus self-funded plans.

Providers should consult legal counsel or state regulators to understand how applicable state statutes interact with the No Surprises Act in their jurisdiction.

How can I verify whether a clinician or facility is in my patient’s insurance network?

Use multiple verification steps: check the insurer’s online provider directory, call the insurer’s provider verification line, confirm the clinician’s NPI and tax ID, and request written confirmation of network status for the specific plan and service date. Because directories can be outdated, always combine insurer confirmation with written provider confirmation and retain that documentation in the patient record.

What documentation should I keep if I plan to dispute a balance billing in healthcare?

Retain the EOB from the insurer, an itemized provider bill, written notice and consent forms, prior authorization records, and the patient’s insurance card and plan information. Also keep timestamped notes of all communications with the insurer and provider.

Certified mail documentation of dispute letters and a clear internal log of who managed the case support both patient advocacy and compliance with IDR or audit requirements.